> For the complete documentation index, see [llms.txt](https://docs.catalystcontributors.org/funding-categorisation-analysis/llms.txt). Markdown versions of documentation pages are available by appending `.md` to page URLs; this page is available as [Markdown](https://docs.catalystcontributors.org/funding-categorisation-analysis/historical-analysis-and-comparisons/funding-access-for-each-focus-area/fund-10.md).
# Fund 10
**Changes for fund 10**
For fund 10 we have updated the funding categories guidelines and precision on the focus areas to include in each category. This led to minor changes in the methodology used in the[ history of funding access spreadsheet](https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1XzlUhgkzE5NGBLa55wqJlgfm8YES3kJ6t5KgZAggtmE/edit#gid=496717707). You can see these minor differences in focus areas used for each category in fund 10 compared to fund 9 and before in the spreadsheet.
### Funding access for different focus areas
### **Funding categories equivalent**
After reviewing the [data covered in the methodology](/funding-categorisation-analysis/historical-analysis-and-comparisons/funding-access-for-each-focus-area/methodology-data-and-feedback.md) for fund 10 a similar funding categorisation outcome could have been achieved with funding categories as an alternative categorisation approach by applying the following budget weightings:
* **Community & Outreach** - 1%
* **Products & Integrations** - 28%
* **Governance & Identity** - 18%
* **Development & Infrastructure** - 53%
### Observations
**Overlapping and similar categorisations**
Fund 10 has seen a number of very similar categorisations be funded including [Development & Infrastructure](https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/dtd/414308-48088), [Developer Ecosystem - The Evolution](https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/dtd/422540-48088) and [OSDE: Open Source Dev Ecosystem](https://cardano.ideascale.com/a/dtd/421335-48088). The issue with these overlapping categorisations is they will make it more confusing for proposers and voters to compare similar proposals and also lead to game theory for proposers in trying to put their proposal in the category with the least competition.
**Lack of funding for community & outreach areas**
There is a severe lack of funding for community & outreach focus areas to the point it is nearly fully excluded from the funding round. The issues with this approach is that the best ideas and proposals from these areas will not be able to be submitted. Excluding whole areas means that the worst proposals that are funded from the areas that are included need to be better than the absolute best proposals from the excluded focus areas for this approach to yield a better outcome.
---
# Agent Instructions
This documentation is published with GitBook. GitBook is the documentation platform designed so that both humans and AI agents can read, navigate, and reason over technical content effectively. Learn more at gitbook.com.
## Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter, and the optional `goal` query parameter:
```
GET https://docs.catalystcontributors.org/funding-categorisation-analysis/historical-analysis-and-comparisons/funding-access-for-each-focus-area/fund-10.md?ask=&goal=
```
`ask` is the immediate question: it should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
`goal` is optional and describes the broader end goal you are ultimately trying to accomplish on behalf of the user. GitBook uses it to tailor the answer towards what is most useful for that goal.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.