Idea Categorisation Analysis
  • Overview
  • Approaches
    • Overview
    • Broad vs Specific Categorisations
    • Inclusive vs Exclusive Categorisations
    • Unique vs Overlapping Categorisations
    • Recurring vs Changing Categorisations
  • Advantages Of Suggested Idea Categories
    • Overview
    • Efficient
    • Simple
    • Flexible
    • Scalable
    • Effectively Directs Funding
    • Egalitarian
    • Promotes Healthy Competition
  • Analysis
    • Incentives & Game Theory For Open Source Development
    • Community Priorities & Idea Proposal Supply Dynamics
    • Addressing Concerns & Challenging Funding Situations
      • High Proposal Competition
        • Proposers With Fewer Resources Considerations
      • Low Proposal Visibility
      • Reducing Idea Generation
      • Decreased Proposal Submission Encouragement
      • Difficulty Directing Funding
      • Reduced Verifiability
      • Less Specialised Challenge Teams
      • Not Enough Proposals Submitted
      • Low Quality Proposals
      • High Quality Proposals Cannot Be Submitted
      • Excessive Funding Requests
    • Alternative Idea Funding Categorisations
      • One categorisation
      • Three categorisations
      • Four categorisations (Recommended)
    • Approaches For Directing Funding
    • Egalitarian Funding Categorisation
    • Focus Area Categorisation Approaches
  • Experimental Categories Analysis
    • Small & Early Stage Ideas Category
      • Use Cases & Types Of Proposer
      • Category Rule Approaches
  • 🔗Links
    • Funding Categorisation Analysis
    • All Documentation
    • Suggest Changes & Give Feedback
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Problem
  • Relevance to funding categorisation
  • Potential Solutions
  1. Analysis
  2. Addressing Concerns & Challenging Funding Situations

Excessive Funding Requests

What happens when there is excessive requests from individuals and teams in the funding categorisations?

Problem

There is a risk that individuals and teams make excessive funding requests in the funding categorisations that are being used

Relevance to funding categorisation

Excessive funding requests are somewhat relevant to funding categorisations as guidelines can be applied to individual categorisations to influence how the categorisations can be used. Alternatively there can also policies, tools, process and guidelines that apply more generally to the funding process that tackle this problem.

Potential Solutions

Category guidelines

Categorisations could apply specific policies and guidelines to improve how that categorisation is used so that it is fair for all participants and so that the categorisation operates effectively.

Capped team budget requests

To prevent individuals or teams requesting an excessive amount of funding proposal budget caps could be introduced. This could be implemented in many ways. It could be a single rule that applies to all teams. There could also be limitations for teams that don't have a track record of delivering to prevent the risk of misallocating funding. It must be noted this requires sufficient analysis and consideration to prevent situations where high cost initiatives that could be very impactful not being able to request larger amounts of funding.

Capped team proposal submissions

The funding process would struggle to support an excessively large amount of proposals that increase voting complexity. There are many approaches for directing funding that can mitigate this issue. However, there is also merit in the fact there is a limit in how many things a single individual or team can work on in parallel. Due to this a sensible cap for proposal submissions would help to reduce the problem of excessive funding requests. Care would be needed to ensure this proposal submission cap is still accommodating to the flow of good ideas going through the process.

PreviousHigh Quality Proposals Cannot Be SubmittedNextAlternative Idea Funding Categorisations

Last updated 2 years ago